CSS Mixed Signal ASIC Solutions

From Concept through Production,
your Mixed Signal ASIC Solution.

Pat

CSS attends November SOC Conference

December 3rd, 2009 by Pat

I attended key sessions of the SoC (System on a Chip) conference in Newport Beach in November. I found a panel discussion titled “Exploring Opportunities for the Integration of Silicon and Biotechnology” to be of particular interest since CSS has developed ASICs for biomedical and medical instrument applications. The panel was made up of professors and industry experts from USC, UCSD, UCI, UCLA, The Canadian Consulate and XFAB. Possible applications for silicon in biotechnology include blood testing, diabetic monitoring, and DNA testing. The panelist noted that silicon suppliers are driven by volume, hence applications that are time sensitive, and repeatable which might require a disposable ASIC would be of very high interest.

Applications in which CMOS could potentially be used are low cost healthcare solutions such as checking for swine flu or Bio-micro sensors. Some of the questions addressed by the panelist included the capabilities of the ASIC - do they provide enough sensitivity, do they have enough dynamic range required how are devices moved from the lab to the consumer or physician?

The panel also discussed possible breakthrough technologies, or “killer applications” which could be solved over the next 20 years. One is an artificial retina. Currently there are clinical trials in Europe for a device with 250 pixels. A breakthrough technology will be needed with more pixels, and a material with plasticity not characteristic of CMOS. Nanotechnology was mentioned as a possibility for meeting this requirement. What would be needed is a photoreceptor with 1,000,000 pixels.

Another future application for silicon in biotechnology is biomarkers. This could lead to more specialized cancer detection. A goal would be to reduce the cost and speed the process for DNA sequencing.

The meeting has generated ideas for new ASIC applications with biomedical companies.

Keith

CSS555C – 2009 Best Product Finalist!

September 12th, 2009 by Keith

The CSS555C, a micro-power, programmable, 555 type timer, was selected as Finalist for Best 2009 Product in the Design News Golden Mousetrap Design Contest.  Frank Bohac, Head of Design at CSS, is the proud designer of this innovative product.  The product specifications can be viewed in the CSS website at http://www.customsiliconsolutions.com/products-for-ASIC-solutions/standard-IC-products.aspx.  See the full listing of Finalists at http://www.designnews.com/channel/Golden_Mousetrap_Finalists.php

CSS555C Best Product for 2009 Finalist

CSS555C Best Product for 2009 Finalist

A quote from Design News Editor-in-Chief Karen Field:   Design News congratulates the winners and finalists of the 2009 Golden Mousetrap Awards for the great work they’ve done to develop new and innovative products for design engineers. These products showcase the highly imaginative ways that today’s engineers are ‘building a better mousetrap,’ and we thank them for their contributions.”

Keith

Custom ASIC Development Cost Considerations

September 1st, 2009 by Keith

Earlier this year in this Blog, I discussed the advantages of a custom mixed-signal ASIC.  Saving money in production over the costs of the components it replaces is one of these advantages.  However, to save money, the savings in production should compensate for the development costs (NRE) in a reasonable amount of time.  This may indicate a relatively high level of production.  However, at CSS we have a way to reduce the NRE for the smaller production requirement.  Typically, we can reduce the NRE cost by 50% for these cases.

A typical ASIC at CSS for high level production may have a development cost (NRE) of $250K.  This is a relatively low NRE for a custom mixed-signal ASIC and reflects our efforts to maintain low NRE costs by optimizing the design process to meet our customer’s needs.  Let’s assume that a custom ASIC can save up to 50% of the cost of the components it replaces.  If a customer wanted to recoup their NRE investment in one year.  They would need to have an annual bill of materials for the original components of $500K.  This may be difficult to meet and would seem to rule-out a custom ASIC for smaller production needs.

However, CSS can significantly reduce the development costs for lower volumes, making a custom ASIC financially attractive.  Working with our silicon fabrication foundries, we can reduce the Mask (or Reticle) costs, a considerable part of the NRE cost, by using a Multi-Layer-Reticle (MLR) approach.  These MLR masks are restricted to low production levels – all we usually need in these cases.  For a straightforward design, using MLR masks, an NRE of $125K is typical.  Using the same financial constraint as the 1st example, a minimum annual bill of materials here would be about $250K, or a 50% reduction in the annual production level.

A further reduction in NRE can be achieved with severe limits on production.  By sharing a mask set with other customers, a custom ASIC can be developed for very low costs.  This approach is often used to prove the concepts and performance of the ASIC with the minimum investment – essentially just the design costs.  After the ASIC is ready for production, production level masks are easily procured.

These examples are typical.  The complexity of the design is also a key factor. Using the above approach, development costs typically range from $50K to $500K.  However, by using our library of proven mixed-signal circuits and by careful selection of a fabrication process to match our customer’s needs, we are able to provide truly low development costs.

CSS can give potential customers a free estimate of both the development NRE and the production unit cost.  With this information, a sound financial decision regarding a custom ASIC development can be made.

Custom Silicon Solutions (CSS) has just released SPICE simulation models for our CSS555 and CSS555C ICs.  These models provide a simulation capability at the component level.  To make them portable across many simulators, only Level 1 device models are used.  The voltage comparators are modeled with BLM gain blocks to reduce simulation time.  Even with these simplifications, the model provides a very good representation of the real IC.

Features:

The CSS 555 Timer model includes:

   1) Supply Current (over VDD)

2) Input Switch Levels

3) Propagation Delay Time

4) Output Drive (over temperature and VDD)

5) ESD Clamp Diodes and Pad Capacitance

The power and trip level settings (stored in EEPROM) change the IC’s supply current, propagation delay and trip level parameters.  Separate SPICE model files are provided for each combination of power and trip level settings.

CSS 555 SPICE Model

The CSS555 SPICE model has been structured to provide an accurate model that runs quickly and is compatible with most SPICE simulators.  It includes the analog portion of the IC and covers most of the important electrical characteristics, including supply current, input levels, output drive and propagation delay.  The model can be used over a wide operating range: VDD = 1.2V to 5.5V, Temperature = -40°C to +85°C.  Most of the device parameters are valid across this range.  Models for different configuration settings (power & trip levels) are also provided, along with tables to adjust the models for worst-case conditions.  Complete details are provided in Application Note 555-2 “CSS555 SPICE Model”.

css555_sim_blog3

CSS became ISO 9001: 2008 certified on July 1, 2009. We have been working over the past year to achieve this important milestone.  Everyone at CSS worked hard to make it happen.  I think we all believe that the systems that are now in place will help us to better serve our customers.  We have also found that the sytems make our job a little easier - by formally putting in place the necessary processes to get the job done.

Robert Shackelford, CSS Quality Manager, was the key person at CSS working to accomplish this goal.  Robert is shown below with Derek Luffman, Certified Lead Auditor, with IMSM, on July 1, 2009, following our successful audit.

Derek Congratulates Robert

Derek Congratulates Robert

Micro-power 555 Timers

Custom Silicon Solutions (CSS) is introducing a new version of the popular 555 Timer IC.  It is pin-for-pin compatible with the original 555 Timer, but by applying an advanced, mixed signal process, we have cut its power by over 10X and have added programmable features to this classic circuit.  It can still be configured to mimic a standard 555 timer, but with its internal timing capacitor and programmable six-decade counter, it can do much, much more.  And, despite all these features, the same eight-pin configuration has been maintained – thanks to a small, built-in EEPROM that stores configuration data.

555 Timer History

The original 555 timer was designed by Hans Camenzind at Signetics in 1970.  Its part number was derived from the three 5KΩ resistors that provide the 1/3 x VDD and 2/3 x VDD trip levels.  It contained about 15 resistors and 25 transistors and drew ~3mA at 5V.  In contrast, our CSS555C device contains over 2000 active and passive circuit elements and draws less than 5uA at 5V.  The 555 timer is one of the most successful and long lived IC’s of all time.  About a dozen manufacturers still produce bipolar and CMOS versions.  Almost 1 billion devices are still sold each year!

A block diagram of the original 555 timer IC is shown below.  It consisted of a resistor divider, two comparators, a flip-flop and two output devices.  Its simple architecture made it extremely flexible.  It has been used in a wide range of applications, too numerous to list.  Entire books can be found that are entirely devoted to application circuits for the 555 timer.

                                                                  Original 555 Timer Circuit

 std555_blockd1

Goal #1 – Reduce Power

One of the goals for our CSS555 timer was to reduce the supply current to below 5uA.  We drew from circuits originally developed for battery powered utility meters and implantable medical devices.  Both applications required micro-power mixed signal ICs.  The result is a new 555 timer that draws 10X less current than any other 555 IC.  A comparison of seven low power 555 timers is shown in the table below.

 idd_vs_vdd1

 

Goal #2 – Make Long Delays Easy to Generate

A second goal for the new CSS555C was to make it easier to generate long delays.  The original 555 timer required a large RC time constant to accomplish this.  Large capacitors have several drawbacks: high price, poor accuracy and wide variation over temperature.  The CSS555C includes an internal six-decade programmable counter that effectively multiplies the value of the timing capacitor by the counter setting.  It provides seven multiplier settings: 1, 10, 100, 103, 104, 105 and 106.  Accurate delay times, from milliseconds to days, are easily implemented with small sized capacitors.

Goal #3 – Provide an Accurate Internal Timing Capacitor

The internal counter eliminates the need for a large value timing capacitor.  It would be even better to eliminate the capacitor altogether.  The CSS555C does that!  A 100pF capacitor has been integrated into the IC.  It features a low temperature coefficient (TC < 100 ppm/°C) and ±1% accuracy.  It is factory trimmed, but can be re-trimmed (electronically) after PCB assembly.  (This allows errors in the timing resistors to be compensated for by trimming the internal capacitor.)

Goal #4 – Reduce the Minimum Operating Voltage, Maintain Speed & Accuracy

Two additional analog settings have been included to increase the flexibility of the device.  The trip levels can be changed from the traditional 1/3, 2/3 to 10% and 90%.  The wider trip levels extend the minimum operating voltage down to 1.2V.  The power level can be increased for applications that require higher speed and/or accuracy.  (Increasing the power level speeds up the comparator response time.)

Goal #5 – Maintain the Standard 8 Pin Configuration

For most timer applications, the CSS555C can be used as a direct replacement for the standard 555.  An internal EEPROM holds the configuration data and capacitor trim setting.  A serial interface, using existing pins, is designed to maintain the standard pin count and functions.  A block diagram of our new CSS555C timer is shown below.  It still has the same basic elements (and 8 pins) of the original 555, but we’ve added some great new features.  A detailed specification can be downloaded from our website and a Demonstration Kit is available to make evaluation of the new IC quick and easy.

                                                        Advanced CSS555C Timer Circuit

 css555c_blockd1

 

 

For more information, contact us at (949) 797-9220

Keith

Pat Fitzpatrick Joins the CSS Sales Team

April 21st, 2009 by Keith

Pat Fitzpatrick has joined the CSS Sales Team.  Pat has over 20 years of sales experience.  Over the years, he has held a number of positions, including Sales Engineer, Account Manager and Field Applications Engineer and Regional Sales Manager.  With this experience, Pat has been able to quickly learn about the CSS products - both our Custom ASICs and our Standard IC Products.

Pat has the ability to meet customer needs by understanding the customer requirements and how our products can satisfy those requirements.  We anticipate that you will be hearing from him soon in his new assignment at CSS. 

Pat is in the process of completing his MBA through the University of Phoenix.  Earlier in his career, he spent four years in the U.S. Marine Corp reaching the rank of captain.

Pat Fitzpatrick
Pat Fitzpatrick

 

Frank

Analog Trimming with On-chip EEPROM

March 24th, 2009 by Frank

Most of our mixed signal ASIC designs benefit greatly by including the ability to trim key analog circuits.  These often include an amplifier gain/offset, a bandgap reference voltage, a bias current generator or the frequency of an oscillator or filter.  A small amount of nonvolatile memory, coupled with an array of FET switches, resistors and capacitors can provide the equivalent of a discrete DIP switch, trim pot or trim capacitor.  An integrated version of these components also has the advantage of providing electronic trimming.

The most versatile type of memory for storing a trim setting is an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory).  As the name implies, it can be written and erased electrically and therefore allows a trim setting to be changed numerous times, either at device test or in the application circuit.  A conventional EEPROM contains a memory core, surrounded by peripheral circuits (row/column drivers, sense amps, etc.).  It may require significant die area and special process steps, both of which may drive the cost of the IC to unacceptable levels.  What’s really needed for holding a trim setting is a small, efficient EEPROM that does not significantly impact cost.

Our nonvolatile registers provide an ideal solution for storing trim settings.  The core memory circuit is a self-contained, nonvolatile latch (NV Latch).  Each NV Latch includes its own level shifter and sense amp, so they can be distributed anywhere they are needed.  They automatically power up to their last programmed state and draw essentially no static current (just junction leakage current – typically less than 1nA).  They can be mated to a wide variety of digital interface circuits to provide serial and parallel read/write access.

Our NV Latch cell does not require any special processing during wafer fabrication, so including it in a design does not add processing steps (or cost).  Even though each bit is completely self-contained, it is still a very area efficient memory.  In the table below, the area required for conventional and latch based EEPROMs are listed.  As expected, when a large number of bits are required, a conventional EEPROM is the densest configuration.  For applications requiring less than several hundred bits, a latch based architecture can be much smaller (and flexible).  For example, a 16 bit NV register requires under 20 square mils or about 1.08 square mils per bit.  This is about the same density per bit as a 0.5K EEPROM, but can be added in 16 bit increments and distributed throughout the IC.  A conventional EEPROM typically has a minimum size of several hundred square mils, corresponding to 256 to 1K bits.  (As the number of bits is reduced, the peripheral circuits dominate the total area required for the memory, making very small memories impractical.)  When less than 100 bits are required, an NV Register can be more than 10 times smaller than a conventional EEPROM.

 EEPROM Area (Conventional vs. NV Latch)

EEPROM

Size (bits)

Total Area

(sq. mils)

Area/Bit

(sq. mils)

 

NV Latch

Size (bits)

Total Area

(sq. mils)

Area/Bit

(sq. mils)

512

567

1.11

 

8

10.3

1.29

1K

640

0.63

 

16

17.3

1.08

2K

790

0.39

 

24

24.3

1.01

4K

1080

0.26

 

32

31.3

0.98

8K

1670

0.20

 

48

45.2

0.94

16K

2850

0.17

 

64

59.1

0.92

32K

5240

0.16

 

128

116.5

0.91

If you are an IC designer and would like to explore the features of our NV Registers for your own design, you can download specifications for our “Classic” and “High Density” macro cells.  Calculators for our latch based and conventional EEPROMs are also available.  (These are interactive tools that provide EEPROM area estimates for different memory configurations.)  You can download specifications and calculators by visiting our Products/IP Products web page.  Look for “16K EEPROM”, “High Density NV Register” and “NV Register” (Classic Version).

Our library of NV Registers provide a very versatile memory for storing analog trim settings.  Because they require minimal area and no extra processing steps, they have little or no impact on part cost, but can significantly improve part performance.  (They often reduce cost by improving yield when a spec is tight.)  We have found these small EEPROMs so useful that almost all of our mixed signal designs use them.  In addition to storing trim settings, we often use them to save counter states (odometers), configuration data and part ID’s.  For more examples of typical applications, see our “Products/Applications Overview” web page.

 

Custom Silion Solutions, Inc along with other key customers was recently invited to ON Semiconductors Executive Meeting in Scottsdale, Arizona. Custom Silicon Solutions (CSS) has been a partner with AMIS (now ON Semiconductor) for over 13 years.

The attendees met to discuss the future stategies for the Integrated Circuit Industry. On Semiconductor executive V.P. Bob Mahoney set the tone of the conference with his statement: “What can we do to help you succeed”.

CEO Keith Jackson followed with challenges that the IC Industry is up against in these difficult economic times. Here at CSS we are using this time to build our Marketing and Sales department and aggressively pursue new business.

The V.P.’s from each business sector at ON Semi continued with the same flavor-how ON Semi is becoming a “solution solving” company by increasing their Field Application Engineers involvement with their customers.

At CSS, we have a similar slogan: “Custom Silicon Solutions is your Turn-Key Solution for Mixed Signal ASIC Development & Production”. We provide these mixed signal custom ASICs to the Industrial, Medical, Security, Sensors and Automotive markets.

In the break out sessions, I met with the sales team that handles our account. We worked together to establish ways in which we could strengthen the CSS-ON Semi partnership.

golf15It was not all work. The best ball/scramble golf tournament and the day at the PGA FBR Open was a good opportunity to have fun and enhance business relationships.

Keith

Why Develop a Mixed Signal ASIC?

March 3rd, 2009 by Keith

 

ic

Our ASIC customers are fully aware of all the advantages of mixed signal ASICs, but for those who have never considered one, this top-level review should be helpful. When compared to a system designed with Standard ICs, a mixed signal ASIC can reduce power, size and production costs and improve performance and reliability. The importance of these advantages varies with the application and your needs.

Power is often a significant consideration. Custom mixed signal ASICs can considerably reduce the power consumption of your electronic system. With power as a primary concern, the logic for a custom ASIC can efficiently be implemented in a state machine and avoid the power consumption of a microcontroller clock solution. Also, analog functions in a mixed signal ASIC can be optimized for low power operation, a feature not often available in Standard ICs. At CSS we find that system power can often be reduced to a small fraction of what it would be in a system built with Standard ICs.

On the other hand, speed may be more important than power. You have the option of a speed/power trade-off in the design of a custom ASIC. Or, perhaps noise is a critical issue in your design. The point is that with a custom mixed-signal ASIC, the characteristics most critical for your application can be optimized during the design of the ASIC.

Analog performance may also improve with a mixed signal ASIC. Here, CSS has a particular advantage. We have developed the capability to trim important analog functions using nonvolatile memory (EEPROM) cells built into the ASIC. For example, with this capability we can trim out production variations and set amplifier gains as needed to meet critical specifications.

Of course, an ASIC is much smaller than all of the Standard ICs that it may replace. So, if this is one of your requirements, a custom ASIC may be the only solution. You can further reduce size by selection of a small surface mount package, such as a QFN package. CSS has access to a wide variety of small packages and packaging facilities to meet your needs.

A custom ASIC will also improve your system reliability. The reduction in component count and their required interconnects at the board level provides for a significant improvement in reliability.

Finally, a custom mixed signal ASIC can significantly reduce your production costs. This is often the primary motivating factor for developing an ASIC. The production cost of a custom ASIC can be considerably less than the Standard IC components it replaces. In addition, the reduction in components will reduce the system assembly costs.

The downside of a custom ASIC often presented is that they are expensive and time consuming to develop. The development cost (NRE) of an ASIC should be compared to the savings it will provide in production. Our experience at CSS is that when a custom ASIC is compared to the Standard ICs it replaces, the development NRE can typically be recovered in a year of production savings.

Development time for a custom mixed signal ASIC is, of course, longer than the development time using Standard ICs. Development time depends on the complexity of the ASIC and the experience of the ASIC design team. CSS has extensive design experience in the development of custom ASICs. By using a proven development process and use of previously designed cells whenever possible, we are able to develop a custom ASIC in a relatively short time.

Finally, in considering the development of a custom ASIC, you need to consider how much knowledge of ASIC development is required and what internal resources are necessary for your development to be successful. Our customers are always pleased to find that they can acquire a mixed signal ASIC without the need to dedicate staff to the job or to cope with all of the technical aspects. We provide a turn-key ASIC solution.

Next Page »